Authors: | Heyninck, Jesse Kern-Isberner, Gabriele Thimm, Matthias Skiba, Kenneth |
Title: | On the correspondence between abstract dialectical frameworks and nonmonotonic conditional logics |
Language (ISO): | en |
Abstract: | The exact relationship between formal argumentation and nonmonotonic logics is a research topic that keeps on eluding researchers despite recent intensified efforts. We contribute to a deeper understanding of this relation by investigating characterizations of abstract dialectical frameworks in conditional logics for nonmonotonic reasoning. We first show that in general, there is a gap between argumentation and conditional semantics when applying several intuitive translations, but then prove that this gap can be closed when focusing on specific classes of translations. |
Subject Headings: | Abstract argumentation Abstract dialectical frameworks Non-monotonic logics Non-monotonic conditionals Conditional logics Non-monotonic reasoning Defeasible reasoning |
Subject Headings (RSWK): | Nichtmonotone Logik Argumentation Dialektische Logik |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2003/40899 http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-22755 |
Issue Date: | 2021-07-06 |
Rights link: | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Appears in Collections: | LS 01 Logik in der Informatik |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Heyninck2021_Article_OnTheCorrespondenceBetweenAbst.pdf | 611.37 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License