Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFriedrich, Tobiasde
dc.contributor.authorHebbinghaus, Nilsde
dc.contributor.authorHe, Junde
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Frankde
dc.contributor.authorWitt, Carstende
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-12T16:01:08Z-
dc.date.available2009-05-12T16:01:08Z-
dc.date.issued2007-02de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/26131-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-8706-
dc.description.abstractThe main aim of randomized search heuristics is to produce good approximations of optimal solutions within a small amount of time. In contrast to numerous experimental results, there are only a few theoretical results on this subject. We consider the approximation ability of randomized search for the class of covering problems and compare single-objective and multi-objective models for such problems. For the VertexCover problem, we point out situations where the multi-objective model leads to a fast construction of optimal solutions while in the single-objective case even no good approximation can be achieved within expected polynomial time. Examining the more general Set-Cover problem we show that optimal solutions can be approximated within a factor of log n, where n is the problem dimension, using the multi-objective approach while the approximation quality obtainable by the single-objective approach in expected polynomial time may be arbitrarily bad.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReihe CI; 224-07de
dc.subject.ddc004de
dc.titleApproximating covering problems by randomized search heuristics using multi-objective modelsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereportde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 531

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
22407.pdfDNB215.81 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org