Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVirgillito, Alfredo-
dc.contributor.authorWilkesmann, Maximiliane-
dc.contributor.authorWilkesmann, Uwe-
dc.date.accessioned2010-10-28T07:51:35Z-
dc.date.available2010-10-28T07:51:35Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10-28-
dc.identifier.issn1863-0294-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/27445-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15819-
dc.description.abstractThis article deals with the question: What enables organizations to manage knowledge transfer? We present principal-agent theory as a foundation to explain barriers of knowledge transfer. We show mechanisms which can solve the principal-agent problem by means of network, organizational, and motivational characteristics. Thereafter, we give some empirical evidence from a survey with medical doctors. The results show that network characteristics in form of direct channels for interaction, organizational characteristics, and intrinsic motivation can support knowledge transfer. These three factors are part of a ‘second level management’.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion papers des Zentrums für Weiterbildung;01-2009-
dc.subjectknowledge management theoryen
dc.subjectknowledge transferen
dc.subject.ddc300-
dc.titleKnowledge management as second level managementen
dc.title.alternativeEvidence from a surveyen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeworkingPaperde
dc.subject.rswkWissenschaftstransferde
dc.subject.rswkWissensmanagementde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Discussion Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
paper 01-2009.pdfDNB119.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org