Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQuashie, Nekehia T.-
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Melanie-
dc.contributor.authorVerbakel, Ellen-
dc.contributor.authorDeindl, Christian-
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-14T14:50:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-03-14T14:50:58Z-
dc.date.issued2021-12-14-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/40791-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-22648-
dc.description.abstractDisclosing socioeconomic differences in informal care provision is increasingly important in aging societies as it helps to identify the segments of the population that may need targeted support and the types of national investments to support family caregivers. This study examines the association between individual-level socioeconomic status and informal care provision within the household. We also examine the role of contextual factors, income inequality, and the generosity of social spending, to identify how macro-level socioeconomic resource structures shape individuals’ provision of care to household members. We use pooled data from the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE, waves 1, 2, 4, 5, 6) and the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA, waves 2, 3, 4, 6, 7). Poisson regression multilevel models estimate the associations between household socioeconomic status (education, income, and wealth), and country socioeconomic resources (income inequality and social spending as a percentage of GDP), and the likelihood of older adults’ informal care provision within the household. Results indicate that lower individual socioeconomic resources—education, income, and wealth—were associated with a higher incidence of older adults’ informal care provision within the household. At the macro-level, income inequality was positively associated while social spending was negatively associated with older adults’ care provision within the household. Our findings suggest that socioeconomically disadvantaged groups are more likely to provide informal care, which may reinforce socioeconomic inequalities. At the national level, more equitable resource distribution and social spending may reduce intensive family caregiving.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean journal of ageing;Vol. 18. 2021-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectInformal caregivingen
dc.subjectSocioeconomic inequalityen
dc.subjectEuropeen
dc.subjectCross-nationalen
dc.subject.ddc300-
dc.titleSocioeconomic differences in informal caregiving in Europeen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dc.subject.rswkEuropa |de
dc.subject.rswkSozioökonomische Entwicklung |de
dc.subject.rswkSoziale Ungleichheit |de
dc.subject.rswkPflegede
dc.subject.rswkHauspflege |de
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
eldorado.secondarypublicationtruede
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-021-00666-yde
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationEuropean journal of ageing. Vol. 18. 2021, Art. No 666en
Appears in Collections:Sozialstruktur und Soziologie alternder Gesellschaften

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Quashie2021_Article_SocioeconomicDifferencesInInfo.pdf642.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons