Authors: | Schmidt, Eva |
Title: | Where reasons and reasoning come apart |
Language (ISO): | en |
Abstract: | Proponents of the reasoning view analyze normative reasons as premises of good reasoning and explain the normativity of reasons by appeal to their role as premises of good reasoning. The aim of this paper is to cast doubt on the reasoning view by providing counterexamples to the proposed analysis of reasons, counterexamples in which premises of good reasoning towards φ-ing are not reasons to φ. |
Subject Headings: | Favoring Guidance Normative reasons Reasoning Suspension of judgment |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/2003/40941 http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-22791 |
Issue Date: | 2020-04-07 |
Rights link: | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Appears in Collections: | Institut für Philosophie |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nous - 2020 - Schmidt - Where reasons and reasoning come apart.pdf | 166.95 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License