Meta-Analysis : Different Methods - Different Conclusions?

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Böckenhoff, Annette	de
dc.contributor.author	Hartung, Joachim	de
dc.date.accessioned	2004-12-06T18:41:56Z	-
dc.date.available	2004-12-06T18:41:56Z	-
dc.date.issued	2000	de
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2003/5013	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15050	-
dc.description.abstract	Different estimation methods for covariance parameters in meta-analyses can result in conflicting p-values concerning the test of treatment effect. We propose a valid method to overcome this problem at least partially by introducing a new estimator for the standard deviation of the common treatment difference.	en
dc.format.extent	225271 bytes	-
dc.format.extent	27458 bytes	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	-
dc.format.mimetype	application/postscript	-
dc.language.iso	en	de
dc.publisher	Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund	de
dc.subject.ddc	310	de
dc.title	Meta-Analysis : Different Methods - Different Conclusions?	en
dc.type	Text	de
dc.type.publicationtype	report	en
dcterms.accessRights	open access	-
Appears in Collections:	Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 475

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
2000_08.pdf	DNB	26.81 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open
tr08-00.ps		219.99 kB	Postscript	View/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Show simple item record

This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org