Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Andreade
dc.contributor.authorSibbertsen, Philippde
dc.date.accessioned2004-12-06T18:50:56Z-
dc.date.available2004-12-06T18:50:56Z-
dc.date.issued2001de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/5277-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15230-
dc.description.abstractCointegration describes the pattern that pairs of time series keep together in long run, although they diverge in short run. A generalisation of this behaviour is the fractional cointegration. Two statistical tests, the M– and ML–test are formulated for fractional cointegration in different situations. It turns out that the robust M–test reaches almost the same power as the maximum likelihood test under certain assumptions. In contrast to this, the power of the M–test is much higher than that of the ML–test if the examined time series is contaminated following the general replacement model.en
dc.format.extent127378 bytes-
dc.format.extent325199 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript-
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherUniversitätsbibliothek Dortmundde
dc.subjectfractional cointegrationen
dc.subjectmaximum likelihood estimationen
dc.subjectrobustnessen
dc.subjectlong memoryen
dc.subject.ddc310de
dc.titleRobust Tests on Fractional Cointegrationen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereporten
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 475

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
29_01.pdfDNB124.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
tr29-01.ps317.58 kBPostscriptView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org