Heyninck, JesseKern-Isberner, GabrieleThimm, MatthiasSkiba, Kenneth2022-05-112022-05-112021-07-06http://hdl.handle.net/2003/4089910.17877/DE290R-22755The exact relationship between formal argumentation and nonmonotonic logics is a research topic that keeps on eluding researchers despite recent intensified efforts. We contribute to a deeper understanding of this relation by investigating characterizations of abstract dialectical frameworks in conditional logics for nonmonotonic reasoning. We first show that in general, there is a gap between argumentation and conditional semantics when applying several intuitive translations, but then prove that this gap can be closed when focusing on specific classes of translations.enAnnals of mathematics and artificial intelligence;Bd 89. 2021, H. 10/11, S. 1075-1099http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Abstract argumentationAbstract dialectical frameworksNon-monotonic logicsNon-monotonic conditionalsConditional logicsNon-monotonic reasoningDefeasible reasoning004article (journal)Nichtmonotone LogikArgumentationDialektische Logik