On the correspondence between abstract dialectical frameworks and nonmonotonic conditional logics

Heyninck, JesseKern-Isberner, GabrieleThimm, MatthiasSkiba, Kenneth2022-05-112022-05-112021-07-06http://hdl.handle.net/2003/40899http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-22755The exact relationship between formal argumentation and nonmonotonic logics is a research topic that keeps on eluding researchers despite recent intensified efforts. We contribute to a deeper understanding of this relation by investigating characterizations of abstract dialectical frameworks in conditional logics for nonmonotonic reasoning. We first show that in general, there is a gap between argumentation and conditional semantics when applying several intuitive translations, but then prove that this gap can be closed when focusing on specific classes of translations.enAbstract argumentationAbstract dialectical frameworksNon-monotonic logicsNon-monotonic conditionalsConditional logicsNon-monotonic reasoningDefeasible reasoning004On the correspondence between abstract dialectical frameworks and nonmonotonic conditional logicsTextNichtmonotone LogikArgumentationDialektische Logik