Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKragh, Helge-
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-06T20:52:05Z-
dc.date.available2007-07-06T20:52:05Z-
dc.date.issued2007-07-06T20:52:05Z-
dc.identifier.issn1863-7388-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/24422-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-7114-
dc.description.abstractThe domain of cosmology is the universe, a singular concept, and basically for this reason cosmology is a science that differs from other sciences. For a long time there have been critical voices which argue that cosmology cannot be a proper science on par with, say, nuclear physics or hydrodynamics. This kind of critique goes a long way back in time, and I review it here in a historical perspective, focusing on the century from 1870 to 1970. I suggest that there are no good reasons to deny cosmology the status of a proper science. On the other hand, I also consider it natural, and a sign of health, that such foundational questions continue to be part of the cosmological discourse.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhysics & Philosophy ; 8en
dc.subjectcosmologyen
dc.subjecthistory of modern cosmologyen
dc.subjectKantde
dc.subjectscienceen
dc.subjectuniverseen
dc.subject.ddc100-
dc.subject.ddc530-
dc.titleThe Controversial Universeen
dc.title.alternativeA Historical Perspective on the Scientific Status of Cosmologyen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticleen
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
eldorado.dnb.zdberstkatid2262420-X-
Appears in Collections:2007

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
008.pdfDNB805.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org