Authors: Groenhart, Harmen
Title: Between hope and fear
Other Titles: Distinctiveness of media accountability online in The Netherlands
Language (ISO): en
Abstract: News media in The Netherlands show great variety in the extent and ways, in which they realize media accountability online in terms of actor transparency, product transparency and feedback opportunities online. It is suggested that even those news rooms that seem to adhere to transparency and public accountability still need to explore the functionality and application of media accountability instruments (MAI). Both in terms of potentials and pitfalls, news rooms need to consider about what they want to be transparent and in what ways. To the extent that online innovations are visible, traditional news media seem to experiment, as is the case with newsroom blogs or the project of hyper local journalism Dichtbij.nl, part of the Telegraaf Company. Various news media have on-going projects on audience participation, online applications and distribution models. However, since many projects merely aim at finding new applications, processes, platforms and business models, it remains to be seen assess whether projects are indeed reasonably innovative and feasible at the same time. The development of an online and therefore immediate, archived, personalized and interactive context, offers practical and ethical challenges to Dutch journalism. These challenges bring shifts in its role and responsibility to society. It means that changes occur in what journalists are accountable for, as well as ways in how they are accountable. The Dutch media landscape lodges various professional accountability instruments like the press council and both profession-wide and news media specific codes of ethics, but some of these instruments receive only moderate support. Proactive openness is more an exception than the rule and may well be a distinctive indicator for quality journalism. Although news media often acknowledge the importance of media accountability offline and online, they often lack the resources or courage to use them or have different priorities. This ambiguous position may indicate that in relation to media accountability online, Dutch news media are between hope and fear: that it will either improve their relationship with the public and fuel professional quality, or ask too much of resources with too little benefit.
Subject Headings: Accountability
Ethics
Europe
Internet
Journalism
Media
Online
Responsiveness
Social Media
The Netherlands
Transparency
Subject Headings (RSWK): Glaubwürdigkeit
Journalismus
Massenmedien
Niederlande
Soziale Software
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2003/29088
http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-2177
Issue Date: 2011-06-01
Rights: This study is part of a collection of country reports on media accountability practices on the Internet. You can find more reports and a general introduction to the methodology and concepts of the reports at: http://www.mediaact.eu/online.html The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 244147. The information in this document is the outcome of the EU project Media Accountability and Transparency in Europe (MediaAcT). The research reflects only the authors’ views and the European Union is not liable for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. The user thereof uses the information at their sole risk and liability.
Publisher: MediaAcT/Erich Brost Institute
Appears in Collections:MediaACT

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MediaAcT_Working_Paper_7_2011.pdfDNB3.3 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



All resources in the repository are protected by copyright.