Meta-Analysis : Different Methods - Different Conclusions?

dc.contributor.author	Böckenhoff, Annette	de
dc.contributor.author	Hartung, Joachim	de
dc.date.accessioned	2004-12-06T18:41:56Z
dc.date.available	2004-12-06T18:41:56Z
dc.date.issued	2000	de
dc.description.abstract	Different estimation methods for covariance parameters in meta-analyses can result in conflicting p-values concerning the test of treatment effect. We propose a valid method to overcome this problem at least partially by introducing a new estimator for the standard deviation of the common treatment difference.	en
dc.format.extent	225271 bytes
dc.format.extent	27458 bytes
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf
dc.format.mimetype	application/postscript
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2003/5013
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15050
dc.language.iso	en	de
dc.publisher	Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund	de
dc.subject.ddc	310	de
dc.title	Meta-Analysis : Different Methods - Different Conclusions?	en
dc.type	Text	de
dc.type.publicationtype	report	en
dcterms.accessRights	open access

Files

Now showing 1 - 2 of 2