Popular support for the no-concessions policy in terrorist hostage takings

dc.contributor.authorMertes, Marc
dc.contributor.authorBöhm, Robert
dc.contributor.authorHüffmeier, Joachim
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-07T08:49:26Z
dc.date.available2025-02-07T08:49:26Z
dc.date.issued2024-11-25
dc.description.abstractGovernmental responses to the frequently occurring terrorist hostage-takings, in which authorities must weigh the lives of the hostages against the lives of potential future victims, depend on popular support for governmental policy. Yet, little is known about how people form their judgement of governmental policies in this moral dilemma. We argue that people typically have imperfect information and their policy support for concessions can be substantially altered by changing the information they possess about different consequences. Across three studies (overall N = 1,547) employing both qualitative and quantitative methods, we found that (a) support for concessions is negatively linked to age and political conservatism, (b) most people either focus only on one aspect or have an imperfect representation of this moral dilemma when thinking about their support for concessions, (c) providing information on the benefits of concessions increases support for concessions, and (d) support for concessions increases when the benefits outweigh the costs and when a salient moral norm prescribes concessions. The potential implications for policymakers are discussed.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/43438
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-25269
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCollabra: Psychology; 10(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectterrorist hostage-takingsen
dc.subjectno-concessions policyen
dc.subjectmoral dilemmaen
dc.subjectinformation processingen
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.rswkGeiselnahmede
dc.subject.rswkTerrorismusde
dc.subject.rswkBevölkerungde
dc.subject.rswkPolitikde
dc.titlePopular support for the no-concessions policy in terrorist hostage takings
dc.typeText
dc.type.publicationtypeResearchArticle
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
eldorado.secondarypublicationtrue
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationMertes, M., Böhm, R. and Hüffmeier, J. (2024) ‘Popular support for the no-concessions policy in terrorist hostage takings’, Collabra: Psychology, 10(1). Available at: https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.124482
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.124482

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
collabra_2024_10_1_124482(1).pdf
Size:
853.99 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DNB
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: