Three Forms of Interpretative Flexibility

dc.contributor.authorMeyer, Ulide
dc.contributor.authorSchulz-Schaeffer, Ingode
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-24T11:58:34Z
dc.date.available2010-02-24T11:58:34Z
dc.date.issued2006-07de
dc.description.abstractInterpretative flexibility is a central concept of social constructivism in science and technology studies. We think this concept, as it exists, can and should be elaborated. In this paper, we argue that interpretative flexibility can be traced back to three different forms of infinite regress: the regress of truth, the regress of usefulness, and the regress of relevance. Resulting from this analysis, we observe three different forms of interpretative flexibility. We will show that in controversies or debates concerning the meaning of certain scientific facts, technological artefacts or research approaches, concurrently or consecutively more than one of these different forms of interpretative flexibility may play a part. With this reconceptualisation of interpretative flexibility, we hope to contribute to a more elaborate understanding of the dynamics of the social construction of scientific facts and technological artefacts.en
dc.identifier.issn1861-3675de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/26747
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-971
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherTechnische Universität Dortmundde
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScience, Technology & Innovation Studiesen
dc.subject.ddc300de
dc.subject.ddc330de
dc.titleThree Forms of Interpretative Flexibilityen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dcterms.accessRightsopen access

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
meyerschulz-schaeffer-3fif-2006.pdf
Size:
592.25 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections