Associations between physical size and space are strongly asymmetrical

dc.contributor.authorRichter, Melanie
dc.contributor.authorWühr, Peter
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-23T12:04:21Z
dc.date.available2024-02-23T12:04:21Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-27
dc.description.abstractThe spatial–size association of response codes (SSARC) effect describes the phenomenon that left responses are faster and more accurate to small stimuli whereas right responses are faster and more accurate to large stimuli, as compared to the opposite mapping. The effect indicates associations between the mental representations of physical size and space. Importantly, the theoretical accounts of SSARC effects make different predictions about the reciprocity and/or symmetry of spatial–size associations. To investigate the reciprocity of SSARC effects, we compared compatibility effects in two verbal choice-response tasks: a size–location (typical SSARC) task and a location–size (reciprocal SSARC) task. In the size–location task, participants responded verbally to a small/large stimulus by saying “left”/“right”. In the location–size task, participants responded verbally to a left-/right-side stimulus by saying “small”/“large”. Participants completed both tasks with a compatible (small–left, large–right; left–small, right–large) and an incompatible (small–right, large–left; left–large, right–small) mapping. A regular SSARC effect emerged in the size–location task. However, no reciprocal SSARC effect emerged in the location–size task if outliers were excluded. If outliers were not excluded, small reciprocal SSARC effects occurred. Associations underlying the SSARC effect are thus strongly asymmetrical: Physical (stimulus) size can prime spatial responses much more strongly than spatial (stimulus) position can prime size-related responses. The finding of asymmetrical associations between size and space is in line with some theoretical accounts of the SSARC effect but at odds with others.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/42350
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-24187
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScientific reports;13
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subjectHuman behaviouren
dc.subjectPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.rswkMensch | Verhaltende
dc.subject.rswkPsychologiede
dc.subject.rswkReizantwortde
dc.titleAssociations between physical size and space are strongly asymmetricalen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeArticlede
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
eldorado.secondarypublicationtruede
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationRichter, M., Wühr, P. Associations between physical size and space are strongly asymmetrical. Sci Rep 13, 16256 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43313-5de
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43313-5de

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s41598-023-43313-5.pdf
Size:
1.15 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DNB
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: