Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Frankde
dc.contributor.authorSudholt, Dirkde
dc.contributor.authorWitt, Carstende
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-12T16:01:21Z-
dc.date.available2009-05-12T16:01:21Z-
dc.date.issued2007-05de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/26137-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-8707-
dc.description.abstractRecently, the first rigorous runtime analyses of ACO algorithms have been presented. These results concentrate on variants of the MAX-MIN ant system by St¨utzle and Hoos and consider their runtime on simple pseudo-Boolean functions such as OneMax and LeadingOnes. Interestingly, it turns out that a variant called 1-ANT is very sensitive to the choice of the evaporation factor while a recent technical report by Gutjahr and Sebastiani suggests partly opposite results for their variant called MMAS. In this paper, we elaborate on the differences between the two ACO algorithms, generalize the techniques by Gutjahr and Sebastiani and show improved results.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReihe CI; 230-07de
dc.subject.ddc004de
dc.titleComparing variants of MMAS ACO algorithms on pseudo-boolean functionsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereportde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 531

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
23007.pdfDNB216.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org