Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchulz-Schaeffer, Ingode
dc.contributor.authorBöschen, Stefande
dc.contributor.authorGläser, Jochende
dc.contributor.authorMeister, Martinde
dc.contributor.authorStrübing, Jörgde
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-24T11:58:32Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-24T11:58:32Z-
dc.date.issued2006-07de
dc.identifier.issn1861-3675de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/26745-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-965-
dc.description.abstractConstructivism has become the overarching scientific paradigm in the social study of science and technology (STS). The notion that scientific facts and technological artefacts result from processes of social construction is the major scientific innovation of the preceding decades in the sociology of science and technology. With constructivism being the established paradigm in this field of research: what comes next? What comes after constructivism in science and technology studies? The contributions of this special issue of Science, Technology & Innovation Studies suggest different answers to these questions which can roughly be subsumed under the three headings 'Spelling out Constructivism', 'Adding Disregarded Aspects', and 'Going beyond Constructivism'.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherTechnische Universität Dortmundde
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScience, Technology & Innovation Studiesen
dc.subject.ddc300de
dc.subject.ddc330de
dc.titleIntroductionen
dc.title.alternativeWhat Comes after Constructivism in Science and Technology Studies?en
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Special Issue 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
introduction-sti-studies-specialissue1-2006.pdf115.73 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org