Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPotthast, Jörgde
dc.date.accessioned2010-02-24T12:07:29Z-
dc.date.available2010-02-24T12:07:29Z-
dc.date.issued2008-07de
dc.identifier.issn1861-3675de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/26769-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-12792-
dc.description.abstractWhy does air traffic control still rely on paper control strips? Is paper safer? This question has been dealt with before, and responses have pointed out that "paper has helped to shape work practices, and work practices have been designed around the use of paper" (Harper & Sellen 1995: 2). The present contribution tries to further specify these claims. At first, the use of paper as a medium of representation in the course of dealing with critical situations will be discussed. Drawing on ethnographic fieldwork carried out in two European Upper Area Control centres, practices linked to the puzzling persistence of the paper strip are then captured along with different types of critical situations. Extending the observation of practices to meso- and macrolevels, it can be shown that paper strips are multiply embedded. They help to stabilise cycles of practices, the permanent reproduction of which is critical to air safety.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherTechnische Universität Dortmundde
dc.relation.ispartofseriesScience, Technology & Innovation Studiesen
dc.subject.ddc300de
dc.subject.ddc330de
dc.titleEthnography of a Paper Stripen
dc.title.alternativeThe Production of Air Safetyen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Issue 1

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
potthaststi1vol4no1.pdf742.66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org