Authors: Kurath, Monika
Title: Nanotechnology governance
Other Titles: accountability and democracy in new modes of regulation and deliberation
Language (ISO): en
Abstract: Current discourses in science, technology and innovation policy describe a shift from formal, governmental, or statutory regulation to non-hierarchical, informal, and cooperative self-regulatory approaches. They narrate a turn from government to governance, described as a “governance turn.” Governance as a new and popular mode of regulation, deliberation and shared responsibility is often linked to favored attributes of science and technology development, and policy making such as democracy and responsibility. This article analyzes the connection between governance and ideas of accountable and democratic science and technology development in the case of nanosciences and nanotechnologies. For this purpose, soft law measures, self-regulatory initiatives, and public engagement projects in Europe and the U.S. were analyzed using the concept of social robustness (Nowotny et al. 2001). The study showed that most of the analyzed governance approaches and engagement projects only partially met aspects of social robustness, and that the governance and deliberative turn in science and technology policy has not led, so far, to greater democracy and responsibility in nanoscience and nanotechnology development. As a consequence, the delegation of techno-political decision making to less socially robust governance approaches might lead to a vacuum in science and technology policy and affect not only academic knowledge production but also the innovative force of a society.
Issue Date: 2010-02-05
Provenance: Technische Universität Dortmund
Appears in Collections:Issue 2

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
kurath-nanotechnology-sti-5-02.pdf193.85 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

Items in Eldorado are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.