Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDroste, Stefande
dc.contributor.authorJansen, Thomasde
dc.contributor.authorWegener, Ingode
dc.date.accessioned2004-12-07T08:19:29Z-
dc.date.available2004-12-07T08:19:29Z-
dc.date.created1998de
dc.date.issued1998-11-08de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/5339-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-5018-
dc.description.abstractIt is often claimed that Evolutionary Algorithms are superior to other optimization techniques, in particular, in situations where not much is known about the objective function to be optimized. In contrast to that Wolpert and Macready (1997) proved that all optimization techniques have the same behavior - on average over all f : X -> Y where X and Y are finite sets. This result is called No Free Lunch Theorem. Here different scenarios of optimization are presented. It is argued why the scenario on which the No Free Lunch Theorem is based does not model real life optimization. For more realistic scenarios it is argued why optimization techniques differ in their efficiency. For a small example this claim is proved.en
dc.format.extent219741 bytes-
dc.format.extent578970 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript-
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherUnversität Dortmundde
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReihe Computational Intelligence ; 45de
dc.subject.ddc004de
dc.titlePerhaps Not a Free Lunch But At Least a Free Appetizeren
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereport-
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 531

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
CI4598_doc.ps565.4 kBPostscriptView/Open
ci4598_doc.pdfDNB214.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org