Are PPP tests erratically behaved? Some panel evidence

dc.contributor.authorCaporale, Guglielmo Maria
dc.contributor.authorHanck, Christoph
dc.date.accessioned2006-12-15T10:59:44Z
dc.date.available2006-12-15T10:59:44Z
dc.date.issued2006-12-15T10:59:44Z
dc.description.abstractThis paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than single time series tests) are used, any evidence of erratic behaviour disappears, and strong empirical support is found for PPP. It appears therefore that recent advances in panel data econometrics might enable us to settle the PPP debate. JEL Classification: C12, C23, F31en
dc.format.extent159050 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/23125
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-14550
dc.language.isoen
dc.subjectErratic behaviouren
dc.subjectPanel testsen
dc.subjectPurchasing Power Parity (PPP)en
dc.subjectReal exchange ratesen
dc.subject.ddc004
dc.titleAre PPP tests erratically behaved? Some panel evidenceen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereporten
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
eldorado.dnb.deposittrue

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
tr43-06.pdf
Größe:
155.32 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
DNB

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
1.92 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: