Editorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?

dc.contributor.authorPrediger, Susanne
dc.contributor.authorWagner, David
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-22T13:14:04Z
dc.date.available2023-06-22T13:14:04Z
dc.date.issued2022-07-22
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/41836
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-23679
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEducational studies in mathematics;111(1)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/de
dc.subject.ddc510
dc.titleEditorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?en
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeArticlede
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
eldorado.dnb.deposittruede
eldorado.secondarypublicationtruede
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationPrediger, S., Wagner, D. Editorial: Single-blind or double-blind review processes?. Educ Stud Math 111, 1–3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10171-3de
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10171-3de

Dateien

Originalbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
s10649-022-10171-3.pdf
Größe:
405.27 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Beschreibung:
DNB

Lizenzbündel

Gerade angezeigt 1 - 1 von 1
Lade...
Vorschaubild
Name:
license.txt
Größe:
4.85 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Beschreibung: