Re-assessing the experiment / observation-divide

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorBoge, Florian J.
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T12:36:01Z
dc.date.available2025-09-15T12:36:01Z
dc.date.issued2024-12-05
dc.description.abstractThe article reevaluates the distinction between experiment and observation. It is first argued that to get clear on what role observation plays in the generation of scientific knowledge, we need to distinguish “experiential observation” as a concept closely connected to experience from “observation” in a technical sense and from “field observation” as a concept that reasonably contrasts with “experiment.” It is then argued that observation construed as field observation can enjoy systematic epistemic advantages over experiment, contrary to appearances.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/43971
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPhilosophy of science; 92(2)
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject.ddc200
dc.subject.ddc230
dc.subject.ddc100
dc.subject.ddc300
dc.subject.ddc150
dc.subject.ddc320
dc.titleRe-assessing the experiment / observation-divideen
dc.typeText
dc.type.publicationtypeArticle
dcterms.accessRightsopen access
eldorado.dnb.deposittrue
eldorado.doi.registerfalse
eldorado.secondarypublicationtrue
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationBoge F.J.: Re-Assessing the Experiment / Observation-Divide. Philosophy of Science. 2025;92(2):470-487. doi:10.1017/psa.2024.23
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2024.23

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
re-assessing-the-experiment-observation-divide.pdf
Size:
269.4 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DNB
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
4.82 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Fakultät für Humanwissenschaften und Theologie