Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDavies, P. L.-
dc.contributor.authorGather, U.-
dc.contributor.authorNordman, D.-
dc.contributor.authorWeinert, H.-
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-25T12:15:57Z-
dc.date.available2007-05-25T12:15:57Z-
dc.date.issued2007-05-25T12:15:57Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/24315-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15737-
dc.description.abstractEven for a well-trained statistician the construction of a histogram for a given real-valued data set is a difficult problem. It is even more difficult to construct a fully automatic procedure which specifies the number and widths of the bins in a satisfactory manner for a wide range of data sets. In this paper we compare several histogram construction methods by means of a simulation study. The study includes plug-in methods, cross-validation, penalized maximum likelihood and the taut string procedure. Their performance on different test beds is measured by the Hellinger distance and the ability to identify the modes of the underlying density.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.subjectModel selectionen
dc.subjectPenalized likelihooden
dc.subjectRegular histogramen
dc.subjectTaut-stringen
dc.subject.ddc004-
dc.titleConstructing a regular histogram - a comparison of methodsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereporten
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 475

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
tr14-07.pdfDNB448.67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org