Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKunert, Joachim-
dc.contributor.authorWilk, Adrian-
dc.date.accessioned2011-09-29T09:26:42Z-
dc.date.available2011-09-29T09:26:42Z-
dc.date.issued2011-09-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/29121-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-2175-
dc.description.abstractThere is an ongoing discussion whether it is wise to randomize the run order of a factorial experiment if there is concern about a possible time trend in the experiment. It can be argued that a randomized order is not very effective because the trend inflates the error. Some authors even criticize that a randomized order will normally not be orthogonal to trend, they claim that therefore there will be bias under the randomized order. On the other hand, a systematic order will only be useful if the true trend is behaving as is predicted by the model. The present paper investigates the properties of different run order strategies in a simulation study with unreplicated factorial designs. We check to which extend the presence of a time trend might inflate the probability of false rejection of a true nullhypothesis, and we compare the power of significance tests based on the half-normal plot under the various run order concepts.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper / SFB 823;38/2011-
dc.subjectHalf-normal ploten
dc.subjectTime trenden
dc.subjectUnreplicated factorial designsen
dc.subjectRandomizationen
dc.subject.ddc310-
dc.subject.ddc330-
dc.subject.ddc620-
dc.titleUnreplicated fractional factorials, analysis with the half-normal plot and randomization of the run orderen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeworkingPaperde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 823

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DP_3811_SFB823_Kunert_Wilk.pdfDNB357.48 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org