Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGuhr, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorSchäfer, Rudi-
dc.contributor.authorSchmitt, Thilo A.-
dc.contributor.authorWied, Dominik-
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-07T15:15:11Z-
dc.date.available2013-05-07T15:15:11Z-
dc.date.issued2013-05-07-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/30307-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-5391-
dc.description.abstractWe analyze a recently proposed spatial autoregressive model for stock returns and compare it to a one-factor model and the sample covariance matrix. The influence of refinements to these covariance estimation methods is studied. We employ power mapping as a noise reduction technique for the correlations. Further, we address the empirically observed non-stationary behavior of stock returns. Local normalization strips the time series of changing trends and fluctuating volatilities. As an alternative method, we consider a GARCH fit. In the context of portfolio optimization, we find that the spatial model has the best match between the estimated and realized risk measures.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper / SFB 823;18/2013en
dc.subject.ddc310-
dc.subject.ddc330-
dc.subject.ddc620-
dc.titleSpatial dependence in stock returns - Local normalization and VaR forecastsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeworkingPaperde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 823

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DP_1813_SFB823_Schmitt_Schäfer_Wied_Guhr.pdfDNB300.19 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org