Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBostandzic, Denefa-
dc.contributor.authorIrresberger, Felix-
dc.contributor.authorWeiß, Gregor N.F.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-27T13:22:09Z-
dc.date.available2013-08-27T13:22:09Z-
dc.date.issued2013-08-27-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/30558-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-10757-
dc.description.abstractDo catastrophe bonds increase or decrease the exposure and contribution to systemic risk of issuing insurance companies? And if such issues influence systemic stability, what design features of the bond and characteristics of issuing insurer cause catastrophe bond issues to destabilize the financial sector? Contrary to current conjectures of insurance regulators, we find that the contribution of ceding insurers to systemic risk actually decreases significantly after the issue of a catastrophe bond. We empirically confirm that a higher pre-issue leverage, a higher firm valuation and previous cat bond issues all exert a decreasing effect on the issuer’s systemic risk contribution.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper / SFB 823;30/2013-
dc.subjectcat bondsen
dc.subjectinsurance industryen
dc.subjectsystemic risken
dc.subject.ddc310-
dc.subject.ddc330-
dc.subject.ddc620-
dc.titleCatastrophe bonds and systemic risken
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeworkingPaperde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 823

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DP_3013_SFB823_Weiß_Bostandzic_Irresberger.pdfDNB222.77 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org