Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRiedel, Natalie-
dc.contributor.authorVan Kamp, Irene-
dc.contributor.authorKöckler, Heike-
dc.contributor.authorScheiner, Joachim-
dc.contributor.authorLoerbroks, Adrian-
dc.contributor.authorClaßen, Thomas-
dc.contributor.authorBolte, Gabriele-
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07T13:23:43Z-
dc.date.available2020-01-07T13:23:43Z-
dc.date.issued2017-05-30-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/38504-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-20423-
dc.description.abstractThe Environmental Noise Directive expects residents to be actively involved in localising and selecting noise abatement interventions during the noise action planning process. Its intervention impact is meant to be homogeneous across population groups. Against the background of social heterogeneity and environmental disparities, however, the impact of noise action planning on exposure to traffic-related noise and its health effects is unlikely to follow homogenous distributions. Until now, there has been no study evaluating the impact of noise action measures on the social distribution of traffic-related noise exposure and health outcomes. We develop a conceptual (logic) model on cognitive-motivational determinants of residents’ civic engagement and health (inequities) by integrating arguments from the Model on household’s Vulnerability to the local Environment, the learned helplessness model in environmental psychology, the Cognitive Activation Theory of Stress, and the reserve capacity model. Specifically, we derive four hypothetical patterns of cognitive-motivational determinants yielding different levels of sustained physiological activation and expectancies of civic engagement. These patterns may help us understand why health inequities arise in the context of noise action planning and learn how to transform noise action planning into an instrument conducive to health equity. While building on existing frameworks, our conceptual model will be tested empirically in the next stage of our research process.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health;2017, 14(6), 578-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectResidential traffic noise exposureen
dc.subjectNoise annoyanceen
dc.subjectBehavioural outcome expectancyen
dc.subjectPerceived behavioural controlen
dc.subjectCopingen
dc.subjectCivic engagementen
dc.subjectHealth inequitiesen
dc.subjectEnvironmental justiceen
dc.subjectLogic modelen
dc.subject.ddc710-
dc.titleCognitive-motivational determinants of residents’ civic engagement and health (inequities) in the context of noise action planning: a conceptual modelen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dc.subject.rswkLärmbelastungde
dc.subject.rswkVerkehrslärmde
dc.subject.rswkBürgerschaftliches Engagementde
dc.subject.rswkSoziale Ungleichheitde
dc.subject.rswkUmweltgerechtigkeitde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
eldorado.secondarypublicationtruede
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14060578de
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationInternational Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Vol. 14, 2017, (6), p. 578de
Appears in Collections:Sonstige Veröffentlichungen des Fachgebiets Verkehrswesen und Verkehrsplanung

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
ijerph-14-00578-v2.pdf1.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons