Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBarbeck, Mike-
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ole-
dc.contributor.authorXiong, Xin-
dc.contributor.authorKrastev, Rumen-
dc.contributor.authorKorzinskas, Tadas-
dc.contributor.authorNajman, Stevo-
dc.contributor.authorRadenković, Milena-
dc.contributor.authorWegner, Nils-
dc.contributor.authorKnyazeva, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorWalther, Frank-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-04T12:19:53Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-04T12:19:53Z-
dc.date.issued2019-10-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/38546-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-20465-
dc.description.abstractThe present publication reports the purification effort of two natural bone blocks, that is, an allogeneic bone block (maxgraft®, botiss biomaterials GmbH, Zossen, Germany) and a xenogeneic block (SMARTBONE®, IBI S.A., Mezzovico-Vira, Switzerland) in addition to previously published results based on histology. Furthermore, specialized scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and in vitro analyses (XTT, BrdU, LDH) for testing of the cytocompatibility based on ISO 10993-5/-12 have been conducted. The microscopic analyses showed that both bone blocks possess a trabecular structure with a lamellar subarrangement. In the case of the xenogeneic bone block, only minor remnants of collagenous structures were found, while in contrast high amounts of collagen were found associated with the allogeneic bone matrix. Furthermore, only island-like remnants of the polymer coating in case of the xenogeneic bone substitute seemed to be detectable. Finally, no remaining cells or cellular remnants were found in both bone blocks. The in vitro analyses showed that both bone blocks are biocompatible. Altogether, the purification level of both bone blocks seems to be favorable for bone tissue regeneration without the risk for inflammatory responses or graft rejection. Moreover, the analysis of the maxgraft® bone block showed that the underlying purification process allows for preserving not only the calcified bone matrix but also high amounts of the intertrabecular collagen matrix.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMaterials;2019, 12(19), 3234-
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/-
dc.subjectBone blocken
dc.subjectAllogeneicen
dc.subjectXenogeneicen
dc.subjectPurificationen
dc.subjectBone regenerationen
dc.subjectDentistryen
dc.subject.ddc660-
dc.titleBalancing purification and ultrastructure of naturally derived bone blocks for bone regenerationen
dc.title.alternativereport of the purification effort of two bone blocksen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dc.subject.rswkKnochenspande
dc.subject.rswkAllogenes Transplantatde
dc.subject.rswkHeterotransplantationde
dc.subject.rswkProduktaufarbeitungde
dc.subject.rswkKnochenbildungde
dc.subject.rswkZahnmedizinde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
eldorado.secondarypublicationtruede
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifierhttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma12193234de
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitationMaterials. 2019, 12(19), 3234de
Appears in Collections:Fachgebiet Werkstoffprüftechnik

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
materials-12-03234.pdf10.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons