Where reasons and reasoning come apart

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Schmidt, Eva	-
dc.date.accessioned	2022-06-08T09:38:25Z	-
dc.date.available	2022-06-08T09:38:25Z	-
dc.date.issued	2020-04-07	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/2003/40941	-
dc.identifier.uri	http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-22791	-
dc.description.abstract	Proponents of the reasoning view analyze normative reasons as premises of good reasoning and explain the normativity of reasons by appeal to their role as premises of good reasoning. The aim of this paper is to cast doubt on the reasoning view by providing counterexamples to the proposed analysis of reasons, counterexamples in which premises of good reasoning towards φ-ing are not reasons to φ.	en
dc.language.iso	en	de
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Noûs;55(4)	-
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	-
dc.subject	Favoring	en
dc.subject	Guidance	en
dc.subject	Normative reasons	en
dc.subject	Reasoning	en
dc.subject	Suspension of judgment	en
dc.subject.ddc	100	-
dc.title	Where reasons and reasoning come apart	en
dc.type	Text	de
dc.type.publicationtype	article	de
dcterms.accessRights	open access	-
eldorado.secondarypublication	true	de
eldorado.secondarypublication.primaryidentifier	https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12329	de
eldorado.secondarypublication.primarycitation	Schmidt, E. Where reasons and reasoning come apart. Noûs. 2021; 55: 762– 781. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12329	de
Appears in Collections:	Institut für Philosophie

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
Nous - 2020 - Schmidt - Where reasons and reasoning come apart.pdf		166.95 kB	Adobe PDF	View/Open

This item is protected by original copyright

View License

Show simple item record

This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License