Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKunert, J.de
dc.contributor.authorMeyner, M.de
dc.contributor.authorQannari, El Musafade
dc.date.accessioned2004-12-06T18:38:11Z-
dc.date.available2004-12-06T18:38:11Z-
dc.date.issued1998de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/4829-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-2877-
dc.description.abstractWe consider a model for sensory profiling data including translation, rotation and scaling. We compare two methods to calculate an overall consensus from several data matrices: GPA and STATIS. These methods are briefly illustrated and explained under our model. A series of simulations to compare their performance has been carried out. We found significant differences in performance depending on the variance of random errors and on the dimensionality of the true underlying consensus. Therefore we investigated on the dimensionality of the calculated group averages. We found both methods to give too many dimensions compared to the true consensus. This finding is supported by some theoretical considerations. Finally we propose a combined approach which takes advantage of both methods and which gave better results in the simulations.en
dc.format.extent490025 bytes-
dc.format.extent63846 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript-
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherUniversitätsbibliothek Dortmundde
dc.subjectconsensusen
dc.subjectdimensionalityen
dc.subjectgpaen
dc.subjectmodified GPAen
dc.subjectsensory profilingen
dc.subjectSTATISde
dc.subject.ddc310de
dc.titleComparing generalized procrustes analysis and statisen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereporten
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 475

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
98_35.pdfDNB62.35 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
tr35-98.ps478.54 kBPostscriptView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org