Authors: Sondhauss, Ursula
Weihs, Claus
Title: Business phase classification and prediction
Other Titles: How to compare interpretability of classification methods?
Language (ISO): en
Abstract: When comparing methods for classification, often the rating relies on their prediction accuracy alone. One reason for this is that this is the aspect that can be most easily measured. Yet, often one wants to learn more about the problem than only how to predict. The interpretation of the relation of predictors and classes is often of high interest, but an unique accepted general formalization of "interpretability" relevant for many classification problems and measurable at least for a wide range of different classification methods does not exist, and - as we believe - is not really what is needed. Instead of trying to measure "interpretability" as such, standardizing and formalizing typical ways to interpret classification rules and finding performance criteria for this kind of outcomes leads to ratings of classification methods w.r.t. interpretability that can be tailored for the specific problem at hand and the subjective preferences of addressees of results. In this short paper, three results of this kind stemming from a comparative study of various classification methods applied to the classification of German business cycle phases based on 13 economic variables are exemplarily discussed .
Subject Headings: business cycle analysis
classification methods
performance measures
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2003/5029
http://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15105
Issue Date: 2000
Publisher: Universitätsbibliothek Dortmund
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 475

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2000_24.pdfDNB143.62 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
tr24-00.ps505.91 kBPostscriptView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



All resources in the repository are protected by copyright.