Comment on logins – on the connection between normative explanatory reasons and normative reasoning reasons
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2024-09-07
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Alternative Title(s)
Abstract
The comment starts with a brief exposition of the Eroteric View put forth by Artūrs Logins. I then provide one friendly comment on the exact form of the normative question which is central to the view, and suggest that in addition to the question, ‘Why ought S to φ ?’, Logins should take the question, ‘Why is S permitted to φ?’ as definitive of normative reasons. In a more critical comment, I reflect on how normative explanatory reasons and normative reasoning reasons relate, calling into question Logins’s claim that the two kinds of reasons are fundamentally distinct. First, I argue that being a normative explanatory reason near enough guarantees being a normative reasoning reason; second, I argue that normative explanatory reasons as well as normative reasoning reasons can be weighed, and that they can be weighed against each other. But this causes trouble for the Eroteric View.
Description
Table of contents
Keywords
Normative reasons, Weighing reasons, Explanation view of reasons, Reasoning view of reasons, Reasons first