Comparing variants of MMAS ACO algorithms on pseudo-boolean functions

dc.contributor.authorNeumann, Frankde
dc.contributor.authorSudholt, Dirkde
dc.contributor.authorWitt, Carstende
dc.date.accessioned2009-05-12T16:01:21Z
dc.date.available2009-05-12T16:01:21Z
dc.date.issued2007-05de
dc.description.abstractRecently, the first rigorous runtime analyses of ACO algorithms have been presented. These results concentrate on variants of the MAX-MIN ant system by St¨utzle and Hoos and consider their runtime on simple pseudo-Boolean functions such as OneMax and LeadingOnes. Interestingly, it turns out that a variant called 1-ANT is very sensitive to the choice of the evaporation factor while a recent technical report by Gutjahr and Sebastiani suggests partly opposite results for their variant called MMAS. In this paper, we elaborate on the differences between the two ACO algorithms, generalize the techniques by Gutjahr and Sebastiani and show improved results.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/26137
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-8707
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesReihe CI; 230-07de
dc.subject.ddc004de
dc.titleComparing variants of MMAS ACO algorithms on pseudo-boolean functionsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereportde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
23007.pdf
Size:
216.77 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DNB