Trends and random fluctuations in athletics

datacite.relationtype.citeshttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/40556
datacite.relationtype.citeshttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/40557
datacite.relationtype.citeshttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/40558
datacite.relationtype.citeshttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/40559
dc.contributor.authorSuter, Dieter
dc.contributor.authorGembris, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, John G.
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-30T13:02:24Z
dc.date.available2008-05-30T13:02:24Z
dc.date.issued2002-05-30
dc.description.abstractImprovements in the results of athletic competitions are often considered to stem from better training and equipment, but elements of chance are always present in athletics and these also contribute. Here we distinguish between these two effects by estimating the range into which athletic records would have fallen in the absence of systematic progress and then comparing this with actual performance results. We find that only 4 out of 22 disciplines have shown a systematic improvement, and that annual best results worldwide1 show saturation in some disciplines.en
dc.identifier.citationGembris, Daniel; Taylor, John G.; Suter, Dieter: Trends and random fluctuations in athletics. In: Nature 417, 506 (2002).de
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/417506a
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/25362
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-2934
dc.identifier.urlhttp://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1038/417506a
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherNature Publishing Groupde
dc.rights© 2002 Nature Publishing Groupen
dc.subject.ddc530
dc.titleTrends and random fluctuations in athleticsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypearticlede
dcterms.accessRightsrestricted
eldorado.identifier.urlhttps://www.nature.com/articles/417506a

Files

License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.11 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: