Partial orderings of default predictions

dc.contributor.authorKrämer, Walter
dc.contributor.authorPosch, Peter N.
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-25T12:20:37Z
dc.date.available2015-08-25T12:20:37Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractWe compare and generalize various partial orderings of probability forecasters according to the quality of their predictions. It appears that the calibration requirement is quite at odds with the possibility of some such ordering. However, if the requirements of calibration and identical sets of debtors are relaxed, comparability obtains more easily. Taking default predictions in the credit rating industry as an example, we show for a data base of 5333 (Moody’s) and 6505 ten-year default predictions (S&P), that Moody’s and S&P cannot be ordered neither according to their grade distributions given default or non-default or to their Ginicurves, but Moody’s dominate S&P with respect to the ROC-criterion.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/34200
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-16279
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper / SFB 823;31/2015
dc.subjectprobability forecastsen
dc.subjectpartial orderingen
dc.subjectrating systemsen
dc.subject.ddc310
dc.subject.ddc330
dc.subject.ddc620
dc.titlePartial orderings of default predictionsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeworkingPaperde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DP_3115_SFB823_Krämer_Posch.pdf
Size:
704.73 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
DNB
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.12 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: