Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDyballa, Katharina-
dc.contributor.authorKraft, Kornelius-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-17T10:10:55Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-17T10:10:55Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/34152-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-7883-
dc.description.abstractContrary to previous literature we hypothesize that interests of labor may well – like that of shareholders – aim at securing the long-run survival of the firm. Consequently, employee representatives on the supervisory board could well have an interest in increasing incentive-based compensation to avoid excessive risk taking and short-run orientated decisions. We compile unique panel data on executive compensation over the periods 2006 to 2011 for 405 listed companies and use a Hausman-Taylor approach to estimate the effect of codetermination on the compensation design. Finally, codetermination has a significantly positive effect on performance-based components of compensation, which supports our hypothesis.en
dc.language.isoende
dc.relation.ispartofseriesDiscussion Paper / SFB 823;22/2015en
dc.subjectExecutive Compensationen
dc.subjectHausman-Tayloren
dc.subjectCorporate Governanceen
dc.subjectPrincipal-Agent Theoryen
dc.subjectCodeterminationen
dc.subject.ddc310-
dc.subject.ddc330-
dc.subject.ddc620-
dc.titleDoes codetermination affect the composition of variable versus fixed parts of executive compensation? - An empirical analysis for listed companies in Germanyen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypeworkingPaperde
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 823

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DP_2215_SFB823_Dyballa_Kraft.pdfDNB242.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org