Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChristmann, Andreasde
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Paulde
dc.contributor.authorJoachims, Thorstende
dc.date.accessioned2004-12-06T18:44:06Z-
dc.date.available2004-12-06T18:44:06Z-
dc.date.issued2000de
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2003/5077-
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.17877/DE290R-15190-
dc.description.abstractThe minimum number of misclassifications achievable with afine hyperplanes on a given set of labeled points is a key quantity in both statistics and computational learning theory. However, determining this quantity exactly is essentially NP-hard, c.f. Simon and van Horn (1995). Hence, there is a need to find reasonable approximation procedures. This paper compares three approaches to approximating the minimum number of misclassifications achievable with afine hyperplanes. The first approach is based on the regression depth method of Rousseeuw and Hubert (1999) in linear regression models. We compare the results of the regression depth method with the support vector machine approach proposed by Vapnik (1998), and a heuristic search algorithm.en
dc.format.extent206713 bytes-
dc.format.extent392830 bytes-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/postscript-
dc.language.isoende
dc.publisherUniversitätsbibliothek Dortmundde
dc.subject.ddc310de
dc.titleComparison between the regression depth method and the support vector machine to approximate the minimum number of misclassificationsen
dc.typeTextde
dc.type.publicationtypereporten
dcterms.accessRightsopen access-
Appears in Collections:Sonderforschungsbereich (SFB) 475

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2000_53.pdfDNB201.87 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
tr53-00.ps383.62 kBPostscriptView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



This item is protected by original copyright rightsstatements.org